How to Audit Your Brand's AI Presence
A step-by-step guide to testing how AI platforms like ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity mention your brand—and what to do with the results.
Orbilo Team
How to Audit Your Brand's AI Presence
You can't improve what you don't measure. Before building an AEO strategy, you need to understand your current state: how AI platforms mention your brand, how you compare to competitors, and where gaps exist.
This guide will walk you through conducting a comprehensive AI brand audit—manually or with tools—so you know exactly where you stand.
Why Audit Your AI Presence?
An AI brand audit reveals:
- Visibility: Are you mentioned at all in relevant queries?
- Accuracy: Does AI describe your product correctly?
- Sentiment: Is the tone positive, neutral, or negative?
- Positioning: How do you compare to competitors?
- Coverage: Which platforms know about you and which don't?
Without this baseline, you're flying blind. You might be losing deals to competitors in AI responses without even knowing it.
The 5 AI Platforms to Test
Your audit should cover all major AI platforms:
- ChatGPT (OpenAI) - Largest user base
- Claude (Anthropic) - Growing professional audience
- Perplexity - Research-focused with web citations
- Grok (xAI) - Real-time, X-integrated
- Gemini (Google) - Google ecosystem integration
Each platform has different training data and retrieval methods, so they'll describe your brand differently.
Step 1: Prepare Your Test Queries
Before testing, prepare a list of queries organized by type:
Direct Brand Queries
- "What is [Your Brand]?"
- "Tell me about [Your Brand]"
- "What does [Your Brand] do?"
These test if AI knows your brand exists and can describe it accurately.
Category Queries
- "Best [product category] tools"
- "Top [industry] solutions for [use case]"
- "[Category] for [customer type]"
These test if AI mentions you when users research your category.
Comparison Queries
- "[Your Brand] vs [Competitor]"
- "Compare [Your Brand] and [Competitor]"
- "Should I use [Your Brand] or [Competitor]?"
These test how AI positions you against competitors.
Use Case Queries
- "How to [solve specific problem]"
- "Best tool for [specific use case]"
- "[Industry] solution for [pain point]"
These test if AI recommends you for specific scenarios.
Feature Queries
- "Tools with [specific feature]"
- "[Category] with [integration/capability]"
- "Best [product] for [technical requirement]"
These test if AI knows your feature set.
Pro tip: Create 3-5 variations of each query type. AI responses can vary based on exact wording.
Step 2: Test Each Platform
For each AI platform, systematically run your queries and document the results.
What to Record
For each response, note:
-
Mention Status
- ✅ Mentioned
- ❌ Not mentioned
- 📝 Mentioned incorrectly
-
Position (if mentioned)
- #1, #2, #3, etc.
- First paragraph vs later in response
-
Description Quality
- Accurate features?
- Correct pricing tier?
- Proper use cases?
- Any errors or outdated info?
-
Sentiment
- Positive: Recommended, praised
- Neutral: Listed without judgment
- Negative: Criticized, warned against
-
Competitor Comparison
- Which competitors mentioned?
- How are you positioned relative to them?
- Who gets more detail/emphasis?
Example Documentation
| Query | Platform | Mentioned? | Position | Sentiment | Notes | |-------|----------|------------|----------|-----------|-------| | "Best project mgmt tools" | ChatGPT | ✅ Yes | #4 | Neutral | Listed after Asana, Monday, Trello | | "Best project mgmt tools" | Claude | ✅ Yes | #2 | Positive | Called "intuitive for small teams" | | "Best project mgmt tools" | Perplexity | ❌ No | - | - | Only mentioned enterprise tools | | "Notion vs Asana" | ChatGPT | ✅ Yes | Equal | Neutral | Fair comparison, accurate | | "Notion vs Asana" | Grok | ✅ Yes | Favorable | Positive | Emphasized Notion's flexibility |
Step 3: Analyze the Results
After testing all platforms, look for patterns:
Coverage Analysis
Calculate your mention rate:
- Total queries tested: 25
- Queries where you were mentioned: 18
- Mention rate: 72%
Benchmark: Strong AEO typically means 85-95% mention rate for relevant queries.
Platform Comparison
Compare performance across platforms:
| Platform | Mention Rate | Avg Position | Sentiment | |----------|--------------|--------------|-----------| | ChatGPT | 80% | 3.2 | Neutral | | Claude | 75% | 2.8 | Positive | | Perplexity | 65% | 4.1 | Neutral | | Grok | 70% | 3.5 | Positive | | Gemini | 85% | 2.1 | Positive |
This reveals which platforms need the most AEO work.
Competitor Positioning
For each major competitor, calculate:
- How often they appear alongside you
- Their average position vs yours
- Sentiment comparison
Example finding: "Competitor X appears in 90% of the same queries as us, but averages position #2 vs our #4."
Gap Analysis
Identify specific weaknesses:
- Missing categories: Which query types never mention you?
- Outdated info: What incorrect details appear repeatedly?
- Weak use cases: Which scenarios favor competitors?
- Feature gaps: Which capabilities does AI not know you have?
Step 4: Compare to Competitors
Don't just audit yourself—audit your top 3-5 competitors using the same queries.
This reveals:
- Who has the strongest overall AEO
- Which competitors dominate specific query types
- What language AI uses to describe market leaders
- How you're positioned relative to the category
Key insight: If a competitor is mentioned 95% of the time and you're at 65%, that's a 30-point AEO gap to close.
Step 5: Document Opportunity Areas
Based on your audit, create an AEO opportunity map:
High-Priority Fixes
- Queries where you should be mentioned but aren't
- Factual errors that appear repeatedly
- Categories where competitors dominate
Medium-Priority Improvements
- Queries where you're mentioned but ranked low
- Use cases where positioning could be stronger
- Platforms with below-average performance
Low-Priority Enhancements
- Queries where you already perform well
- Refinements to already-accurate descriptions
- Sentiment improvements where you're already neutral/positive
Step 6: Create Your Baseline Dashboard
Set up a simple tracking dashboard to monitor over time:
Metrics to Track Monthly:
- Overall mention rate across all platforms
- Average position when mentioned
- Sentiment breakdown (% positive/neutral/negative)
- Mention rate by platform
- Comparison vs top 3 competitors
Example Dashboard Layout:
MONTH: January 2026
Overall Metrics:
- Mention Rate: 72% (↑ 5% from Dec)
- Avg Position: 3.4 (↓ 0.3 from Dec)
- Positive Sentiment: 45%
Platform Performance:
- ChatGPT: 80% mentions, #3.2 avg
- Claude: 75% mentions, #2.8 avg
- Perplexity: 65% mentions, #4.1 avg
...
Competitor Comparison:
- Us: 72% mention rate
- Competitor A: 88% (gap: -16%)
- Competitor B: 65% (gap: +7%)
This makes it easy to spot trends and measure improvement.
Automating Your Audit with Tools
Manual auditing is time-consuming and hard to scale. For comprehensive monitoring, consider tools like Orbilo that:
- Run tests automatically across all platforms
- Track changes over time
- Alert you to significant shifts
- Monitor competitor performance
- Generate sentiment scores
- Identify new brand discoveries
Time savings: Manual audit = 8-12 hours per month. Automated monitoring = continuous, real-time insights.
Common Audit Findings
Here's what typical audits reveal:
Finding #1: Platform Inconsistency
"ChatGPT knows us well, but Perplexity rarely mentions us."
Why: Different training data and retrieval methods. Perplexity relies more on real-time web content.
Fix: Improve your web presence and earned media coverage.
Finding #2: Outdated Information
"AI describes our old pricing model from 2 years ago."
Why: AI training data has a lag. Older information may be more prevalent in training sets.
Fix: Create authoritative, up-to-date content that AI can reference.
Finding #3: Strong Category, Weak Use Cases
"We're mentioned for general 'project management' but not for our specialty: 'remote team collaboration.'"
Why: Limited association between your brand and specific use cases.
Fix: Create content explicitly connecting your brand to those use cases.
Finding #4: Competitor Always Mentioned First
"When AI lists tools, Competitor X is always #1, we're always #4."
Why: Stronger information ecosystem and brand authority signals.
Fix: Build authoritative content, earn quality media mentions, strengthen category leadership.
What to Do After Your Audit
Armed with audit results, you can:
-
Set AEO Goals
- Target mention rates by platform
- Desired positioning vs competitors
- Timeline for improvements
-
Prioritize Improvements
- Focus on high-impact, low-hanging fruit first
- Address factual errors immediately
- Build long-term content strategy for weak areas
-
Build Your AEO Strategy
- Content creation plan
- PR and media outreach
- Information ecosystem development
- Monitoring and measurement cadence
-
Track Progress
- Re-run audit monthly or quarterly
- Measure improvement against baseline
- Adjust strategy based on results
Your Audit Checklist
Use this checklist to ensure a thorough audit:
- [ ] Prepared 15-25 test queries across 5 types
- [ ] Tested all 5 major AI platforms
- [ ] Documented mention rate, position, sentiment for each
- [ ] Analyzed patterns and identified gaps
- [ ] Audited top 3-5 competitors
- [ ] Created baseline metrics dashboard
- [ ] Documented specific improvement opportunities
- [ ] Set AEO goals and priorities
Next Steps
Now that you understand your current AI brand presence:
- How to Improve Your Brand's AI Mentions - Actionable tactics for better AEO
- AEO for SaaS Companies - Industry-specific strategies
- What is Answer Engine Optimization? - Understand the fundamentals
Want continuous AI brand monitoring without the manual work? Start tracking with Orbilo to get automated audits across all major platforms.